(UPDATE: Sal’s insipid response at the end of this post)
Just when you thought Creationists could sink no lower… Just when you thought Salvador Cordova had scraped the very bottom of the barrel… Just when you thought that in space no one could hear you scream…
Sexual relationships between humans and animals come as such a shock to people, but it doesn’t to me. There can be very deep, meaningful relationships between humans and their pets.Skatje Myers (daughter of Darwinist PZ Myers)
I’m refraining commenting on the morality of human-animal sex in this post, but human animal sex just sounds plain icky, ICKY with a capital “I”. Imagine you are the proud parent of a young lady, and then she introduces you to her prospective fiance, the “man” she wants as her husband:
Slimy Sal actually quotemined that from the page of seventeen year old Skatje Myers (daughter of the ever awesome PZ Myers whom Sal hasn’t the balls to go after directly). As is par for the course for Slimy Sal, he didn’t bother linking to the original post, knowing that his lazy sychophants (mostly the utterly ignorant housewife known as Ftk) wouldn’t bother to go check out the integrity of his quote. Not that it would have mattered to her, but if she had, she could have read the very first sentences of Skatje’s post:
Allow me to first tell you that I personally do not have an interest in bestiality. I don’t support it being legal because I want to hump animals.
More rant, below the fold.
Skatje takes the time to address the issue of zoophilia in light of evidence, thinks thoughtfully and rationally about the matter, and comes to this conclusion:
That said, I remind you that my position isn’t based on my own personal wants. I just don’t see any reason to ban it other than the same reason things like homosexuality and sodomy were banned: it’s icky. I think it’s bad practice to put social taboos into legislature when no actual logical argument can be made against it.
(It’s actually a very well thought out and well written article, and I’d recommend reading the whole thing for its own sake.)
But true to form, neither Slimy Sal nor Ftk let truth or honesty or reality or any of those types of things get in the way of a good atheist/evolutionist/darwinist bashing. Far be it from Jesus’ footsoldiers to lower themselves from the high moral ground they take in winning souls for Jesus and turning this into a proper Theocracy to stoop down to the level of Truth Telling or Integrity. Lying for Jesus is a small price to pay for world domination for Him.
The both of them disgust me. With adherents like these being the very loud and public face of Christianity, it’s no damned wonder people like me find the religion more repulsive by the day.
Salvador Cordova – The Most Disgusting Piece of Spooge on Teh Interwebs.
Ftk – Close Runner Up, following behind mindlessly as usual.
(A peek above our garters to Albatrossity of AtBC for bringing this steaming pile to our attention.)
UPDATE: I just wanted to take a moment to welcome all the Pharyngulites that are dropping by since Dr. PZ got wind of Sal’s latest display of heinous disgustipation. Feel free to drop a comment, no need to register or link or anything (if you don’t want to).
SAL RESPONDS: (at his closed blog where no one but he and FtK can comment, of course)
Long time no see. How is our internet Darwinist Tranvestite doing these days. Ed Brayton informs us that you’re really a dirty old man pretending to be a young lady on the net.
Are you going to go all the way like theistic Darwinist John Roughgarden?
Comment by scordova — January 2, 2008 @ 7:05 pm
Y’know Sal, you should come out from behind Ftk’s petticoats and comment somewhere that you aren’t protected by a girl and control of the moderation. You’re not only a scum sucking pig, but you’re a sissy, too. Perhaps you could at least learn to read for comprehension. (Thanks for the head’s up, Janine.)